Customer Reviews for Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress

This product is no longer available. Continue shopping at Urban Outfitters.

Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress

Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress
Average Customer Rating:
1.333 out of 5
1.3
 out of 
5
(3 Reviews) 3
0 Based onout of 3(0%) reviewswould recommend to a friend.
Sort By: Customer Reviews for Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress
Review 1 for Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Lyd63
Location: URUGUAY
Age: 45-54
Gender: Female

Worst purchase ever

(November 25, 2012)
"I was expecting a dress and I received a black rag really hideous. I really like UO but this dress is impossible."
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Review 2 for Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress
Overall Rating: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
flowerpunk
Location: long beach, ca
Age: 18-24
Gender: Female

i'm wevs about it...

(September 20, 2012)
"So I knew it would be a different color and print, I was expecting that. But the dress I received was pretty whatever. The red dress in the picture has separate panel of fabric at the bust, and has interestingly placed pockets. Those were some of the details I liked best about the dress. The dress I received has no print, no pockets, and no top panel. Its literally a skirt from a thrift store worn as a dress with floppy sleeves attached. Not enough detail for me. But thanks for the DIY idea..."
+5points
5of 5voted this as helpful.
Review 3 for Urban Renewal Stulich Gauze Dress
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Fit
Runs a little small
Runs small
True to size
Runs large
olderwoman
Location: New York, NY
Age: Over 65
Gender: Female
Body Type: Slim

Total Disappointment

(July 27, 2012)
"I ordered this (supposed to be) fun dress in the red. I realized that it was not going to be exactly like the one pictured, but I didn't think it was going to be a rag that bore no resemblance to the charmming images.
I love UO, order frequently and am usually very pleased with the merchandise, but this is just plain junky, with no style at all. It is going back.
Sorry!"
+11points
11of 11voted this as helpful.